VI
VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY INC (VSH)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2025 revenue was $762.3M, up ~7% sequentially and roughly in line with consensus ($763.1M*); GAAP diluted EPS was $0.01, while adjusted EPS was a loss of $(0.07), missing the EPS consensus ($0.02*) as non-GAAP adjustments and Newport drag weighed on profitability .
- Gross margin was 19.5%, including an approximately 160 bps negative impact from the addition of Newport; adjusted EBITDA was $63.5M and EBITDA $74.8M, ahead of consensus EBITDA ($60.9M*), supported by cost actions and SG&A benefit from a favorable contingency .
- Book-to-bill was 1.02 (semis 0.98, passives 1.06); backlog held at 4.6 months, with management citing broad-based sequential growth across end markets, regions, and channels .
- Q3 2025 guidance: revenue $775M ± $20M and gross margin 19.7% ± 50 bps, including Newport drag of ~160–185 bps—signaling a modest sequential improvement in margin despite ongoing depreciation and Newport ramp costs .
Values retrieved from S&P Global for consensus marked with an asterisk.
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- “Promising signals” drove a 7% sequential revenue increase; growth delivered across semis and passives, end markets, regions, and to distributors and EMS customers .
- Book-to-bill above 1.0 and backlog steady at 4.6 months suggest demand normalization and improved orders, aligning with management’s upturn readiness from capacity investments .
- EBITDA outperformed consensus* and gross margin modestly exceeded prior-quarter guidance, aided by SG&A benefit from a favorable contingency ($11.3M) .
-
What Went Wrong
- Adjusted EPS of $(0.07) missed consensus* despite GAAP EPS of $0.01; margin remains pressured by Newport integration (≈160 bps drag) and higher depreciation .
- Free cash flow remained negative (–$73.2M), with operating cash flow a modest outflow (–$8.8M) and capex elevated as the company continues capacity expansion .
- Interest expense increased sequentially (to $10.6M), continuing to weigh on net income amid U.S. revolver usage and investment in strategic projects .
Financial Results
Q2 2025 Actual vs Wall Street Consensus (S&P Global):
Values retrieved from S&P Global for consensus marked with an asterisk.
KPIs and Cash Metrics:
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “The promising signals we saw emerging at the beginning of the year contributed to a 7% sequential increase in revenue… With market indicators remaining directionally positive, our investments in capacity expansion positions Vishay to be ready to participate more fully in the market upturn.” — Joel Smejkal, President & CEO .
- On tariffs: “We have procedures and systems in place since 2018 to pass along tariff adders… our exposure to the tariffs… is limited.” — Joel Smejkal .
- On Newport: “Utilization was very low… we’ll be adding volume quarter-on-quarter… target is for the fab to be gross margin neutral in the first half of ’26.” — Joel Smejkal .
- On demand normalization: “Distribution customer POS was up in all regions… book-to-bill remains positive for both semis and passives.” — Joel Smejkal .
Q&A Highlights
Note: We attempted to retrieve the Q2 2025 call transcript but the document was unavailable due to a database inconsistency. Below are the most recent Q&A highlights from Q1 2025, many of which remained salient in Q2.
- Distribution strategy: SKU additions continue; inventory normalized by region; focus on gaining POS and share .
- Tariff framework: Limited exposure; pass-through mechanics reduce gross margin mathematically by ~30 bps; input cost increases (metals) included in guidance .
- Newport ramp and margin: Stair-step utilization increases through 2025; margin-neutral target exiting 2025/early 2026 .
- Cyclical recovery vs pull-ins: Strength in smart grid, defense, AI; automotive schedules showing better first-half volumes .
- Gross margin dynamics: ASP declines absorbed; cost reductions and volume leverage anticipated; depreciation elevated; tariffs embedded .
Estimates Context
- Revenue was essentially in line with consensus ($762.3M vs $763.1M*, ~0.1% miss) .
- EPS: Adjusted EPS of $(0.07) missed consensus* (~$0.02*); GAAP diluted EPS was $0.01, reflecting a divergence between GAAP and Street’s primary EPS basis .
- EBITDA: $74.8M exceeded consensus* ($60.9M*), aided by cost actions and SG&A benefit; adjusted EBITDA margin 8.3% .
Values retrieved from S&P Global for consensus marked with an asterisk.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Sequential demand improvement appears durable: book-to-bill >1, backlog steady, and broad-based growth across end markets and regions—supporting the Q3 revenue and margin guide .
- Margin trajectory is improving modestly, but Newport remains a headwind (160–185 bps in Q3); watch depreciation and Newport utilization as the primary swing factors for gross margin recovery .
- Earnings quality matters: GAAP EPS of $0.01 vs adjusted EPS loss reflects non-GAAP adjustments (notably the $11.3M SG&A contingency benefit); Street will likely focus on adjusted EPS miss versus consensus* .
- Cash generation remains pressured by elevated capex and operating cash volatility; negative free cash flow persists—monitor capex cadence, revolver usage, and operating cash flow trajectory through 2H25 .
- AI and smart grid are emerging catalysts: design-in breadth across semis and passives, and smart grid wins (including U.S. HVDC project) provide medium-term optionality as projects scale .
- Near-term trading setup: Inline revenue with an EPS miss (adjusted) may cap immediate upside; however, positive guide and book-to-bill could support sentiment if margin execution and Newport drag moderation materialize in Q3 .
- Medium-term thesis: Capacity expansions (Newport, outsourced fabs, Mexico passives) and solution-selling strategy position VSH to capture share in an upturn, especially in automotive hybrid, AI power, and grid infrastructure .