Sign in

Brian Stuglik

Director at VerastemVerastem
Board

About Brian Stuglik

Brian M. Stuglik, R.Ph., age 65, is a Class II director of Verastem (VSTM). He served as Verastem’s CEO from July 2019 to July 2023 and has been on the Board since September 2017. He holds a B.S. in Pharmacy from Purdue University and brings three decades of oncology commercialization and product strategy experience, including senior leadership at Eli Lilly’s oncology division . He is currently not considered independent by the Board due to his prior executive role and ongoing consulting relationship with Verastem .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureCommittees/Impact
Verastem, Inc.Chief Executive OfficerJul 2019 – Jul 2023Led strategic shift to RAS/FAK programs; transitioned to director post-retirement
Verastem, Inc.Director (Class II)Sep 2017 – PresentGovernance and commercialization oversight
Proventus Health Solutions, LLCFounderJan 2016 – PresentConsulting for pharma/biotech commercialization
Eli Lilly & Company (Oncology)VP & Chief Marketing Officer2009 – Dec 2015Global oncology marketing leadership

External Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureNotes
Oncopeptides AB (STO: ONCO)DirectorCurrentPublic oncology company director
Puma Biotechnology, Inc. (Nasdaq: PBYI)DirectorCurrentPublic oncology company director

Board Governance

  • Independence: Not independent (former CEO and current consultant to the Company; Board deems all others independent except the current CEO and former CFO) .
  • Committee assignments: Chair, Commercialization Committee; Members include Anil Kapur and Karin Tollefson . Commercialization Committee met five times in 2024 .
  • Attendance: Board met eight times in 2024; each director attended at least 75% of Board and committee meetings on which they served .

Fixed Compensation

ComponentAmountNotes
Annual base retainer (non-employee director)$45,000Standard director cash retainer
Commercialization Committee Chair fee$20,000Chair premium
Total fees earned in cash (2024)$65,000Retainer + chair fee
Consulting fees (2024)$6,000Post-CEO consulting at $400/hour

Performance Compensation

Equity ElementGrant specifics2024 Fair ValueVesting
Annual Grant – Options12,500 optionsIncluded in $74,557 option awards total Monthly over one year (service-based)
Annual Grant – RSUs8,333 RSUs$27,249 stock awards total (RSUs fair value) Monthly over one year (service-based)
Option Exchange (Jan 2024 approval; Mar 11, 2024 grant)Exchanged 11,865 underwater options for new optionsIncremental fair value included in $74,557 total New options generally re-vest; company-wide program described (e.g., time-based re-vesting schedules)

No director-specific performance metrics tied to compensation were disclosed; director equity is service-vested, not performance-vested .

Other Directorships & Interlocks

CompanyTypePotential Interlock/Conflict Consideration
Oncopeptides ABPublic biotech (oncology)Sector overlap with VSTM commercialization focus; potential information flow/conflict risk managed via director independence standards and related-party review processes
Puma Biotechnology, Inc.Public biotech (oncology)Sector overlap; Board oversees independence and conflicts; Stuglik is not independent at VSTM

Expertise & Qualifications

  • Pharmacy degree (Purdue University); 30+ years in oncology commercialization and product strategy .
  • Former VP & Chief Marketing Officer, Eli Lilly Oncology (global leadership) .
  • Industry memberships (ASCO, AACR, IASLC) noted in prior proxy disclosure, underscoring clinical oncology domain engagement .

Equity Ownership

Ownership DetailAmount% OutstandingNotes
Total beneficial ownership355,130 shares<1%As of Mar 25, 2025
Direct/common shares86,834n/aHeld directly
Options exercisable within 60 days266,907n/aIncluded in beneficial tally
RSUs vesting within 60 days1,389n/aIncluded in beneficial tally
Outstanding equity awards (12/31/2024)379,752 options; 11,032 unvested RSUsn/aAggregate awards held
Hedging/pledgingProhibitedn/aCompany policy bans hedging/pledging for directors

Section 16 compliance: One late Form 4 filing (withholding tax sale upon RSU vest) noted for Stuglik; otherwise timely compliance .

Governance Assessment

  • Strengths

    • Deep commercialization expertise; chairs the Commercialization Committee that met five times in 2024, supporting launch readiness and market access strategy alignment .
    • Regular equity grants align director incentives with shareholder value via time-vested options and RSUs; addition of RSUs in 2024 broadens alignment beyond options .
    • Board maintains robust committee structure and independence standards; Audit Committee oversees related-party transactions and compliance .
  • Risks and Red Flags

    • Independence: Stuglik is classified as not independent due to former CEO status and ongoing consulting relationship—potential conflict in oversight of commercialization decisions he chairs .
    • Related-party exposure: Consulting agreement at $400/hour (with $6,000 paid in 2024) creates economic ties; requires ongoing oversight by independent directors/Audit Committee .
    • Option Exchange Program: Shareholder-approved repricing-style exchange allowed underwater options to be swapped for new options (directors participated; Stuglik exchanged 11,865) — typically viewed as a governance risk signal, albeit mitigated by shareholder approval and re-vesting to enhance retention .
    • Sector interlocks: Board seats at oncology companies (Oncopeptides, Puma) heighten potential for perceived conflicts or information asymmetries; transparency and recusals may be necessary in overlapping decisions .
    • Section 16 timeliness: One late Form 4 (tax withholding sale) — minor compliance miss but noteworthy .
  • Alignment and Attendance

    • Cash/equity mix: 2024 cash fees of $65,000 plus equity awards (options/RSUs) indicate meaningful at-risk component via equity, consistent with director alignment practices; RSUs added in 2024 reduce risk vs options alone .
    • Attendance threshold met (≥75%), supporting engagement .

Overall, Stuglik’s commercialization leadership can enhance board effectiveness for launch execution, but his non-independence and consulting relationship introduce conflict risks that warrant strict oversight, clear recusals when appropriate, and continued transparency around director equity programs and external board roles .