Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Rajiv Malik

Director at ViatrisViatris
Board

About Rajiv Malik

Rajiv Malik served on the Viatris (VTRS) Board since 2020; he is a former President of Viatris (retired April 2024) and was Chair of the Science and Technology Committee. As of the 2025 proxy, he is not independent under NASDAQ listing rules and is not nominated for re‑election at the 2025 Annual Meeting, marking his retirement from the Board at the end of his current term . Age was disclosed as 63 in the 2024 proxy; his career spans senior roles at Mylan/Matrix Labs, Sandoz, and Ranbaxy, with global operational and R&D oversight experience .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureCommittees/Impact
ViatrisPresident (from closing of Combination in 2020 to April 2024); Director2020–2024 (President), 2020–2025 (Director)Led global commercial, scientific, operational, IT, BD; integrated legacy companies; stabilized business
MylanPresident (2012–2020), EVP & COO (2009–2012), Head of Global Technical Operations (2007–2009)2007–2020Strategy for acquisitions, execution/integration; led operations across >165 countries and >40 manufacturing sites
Matrix Laboratories Limited (now Mylan Laboratories Limited)Chief Executive Officer2005–2008Leadership of generics manufacturing and operations
Sandoz GmbHHead of Global Development and Registrations2003–2005Global development/registration leadership
RanbaxyHead of Global Regulatory Affairs and Head of Pharma Research1999–2003Regulatory and research leadership

External Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureCommittees/Impact
Biocon Biologics Limited (majority-owned subsidiary of Biocon Limited)Non-executive, non-independent and Viatris nominee DirectorSince 2022Viatris nominee; governance presence in a key industry affiliate
MylanDirector (former)2012–2020Former board experience pre-Combination

Board Governance

  • Independence: Not independent under applicable NASDAQ listing rules .
  • Committee assignments: Chair, Science and Technology Committee; committee re‑established in May 2024 with Malik as Chair .
  • Committee activity: Science & Technology held 5 meetings in 2024 and 4 meetings through Oct 20, 2025 .
  • Board attendance context: Board met 7 times in 2024 and 9 times Jan 1–Oct 20, 2025; all directors standing for re‑election attended >75% of aggregate meetings (Malik was not standing for re‑election) .
  • Executive sessions: Independent directors met in executive session five times in 2024 and six times through Oct 20, 2025 .
  • Board transition: Malik not nominated for re‑election at the 2025 Annual Meeting; retirement at end of term .
Governance ElementDetailSource
Independence statusNot independent
Committee membershipScience & Technology (Chair)
S&T meetings2024: 5; 2025 (through Oct 20): 4
Retirement from BoardNot nominated in 2025; retiring at end of term
Board meetings2024: 7; 2025 YTD: 9
Exec sessions (independent directors)2024: 5; 2025 YTD: 6

Fixed Compensation

Non‑Employee Director Compensation (FY2024) – Rajiv Malik

ComponentAmount (USD)Notes
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash$128,005Director fees post‑retirement from management
RSUs (grant date fair value)$225,009RSUs granted in 2024; vested on March 4, 2025
All Other Compensation$22,773Residual company car benefit (incl. insurance and ancillary expenses) relating to prior service
Total$375,787Sum of above

Director Compensation Structure (effective 2025; unchanged from 2024) – Policy

ElementAmount
Board Member Retainer$150,000
Chair of the Board Compensation$225,000
Vice Chair Compensation$50,000
Committee Chair Fee$25,000
Executive Committee Member Fee$25,000
Annual Equity Grant (RSUs)$225,000

Non‑Employee Director Share Ownership Guidelines: 5x annual cash retainer (excluding committee service fees); compliance window of five years; unvested RSUs count; anti‑hedging/anti‑pledging policy in place for directors and Section 16 officers .

Performance Compensation

Executive pay metrics relevant to Malik’s prior NEO service (context for his outstanding awards):

ProgramMetric / StructureDetail
Long-Term Incentive (2024 awards for NEOs)PRSUs (65%) with TSR modifier; RSUs (35%)Mix reinforces pay‑for‑performance; RSUs vest ratably over 3 years; PRSUs per plan
Annual Incentive (2024)Adjusted EBITDA, Free Cash Flow, Global Regulatory SubmissionsMetrics set with rigor; 2024 outcomes would have funded 163.92%, reduced to 140% via negative discretion due to Indore import alert timing
Pay Versus Performance linkage (2024)Most important measuresAdjusted EBITDA, Free Cash Flow, Relative TSR

2025 program changes reflecting shareholder feedback:

  • Increased difficulty: Maximum Adjusted EBITDA set at 110% of target (from 105%) .
  • Reduced weighting: Global Regulatory Submissions reduced from 20% to 10% .
  • Added personal objective: 10% weighting for 2025 annual incentive .

Other Directorships & Interlocks

CompanyMarketRoleTenurePotential Interlock/Notes
Biocon Biologics LimitedPrivate (majority-owned by Biocon)Viatris nominee Director (non‑exec, non‑independent)Since 2022Governance linkage via nominee designation
MylanPublic (historical)Director (former)2012–2020Pre‑Combination legacy ties

Expertise & Qualifications

  • Extensive global operational, scientific, regulatory, and commercial leadership across generics and established products with oversight in >165 countries and >40 manufacturing facilities .
  • Skills noted: Public Company Management; Finance/Accounting/Capital Markets; Healthcare Industry; Information Security; Legal/Regulatory Oversight; Risk Oversight/Compliance; Strategy & M&A; Global Business; Human Capital/DEI .

Equity Ownership

HolderBeneficial Ownership (shares)Options Exercisable and Restricted Shares Vesting within 60 days% of Class
Rajiv Malik1,068,262 373,903 <1%

Unvested Director/Executive Equity (as of Dec 31, 2024):

  • Unvested RSUs: 1,309,759 (Malik) .
  • Aggregate director stock options held: 373,903 (Malik) .

Policy alignment:

  • Director ownership guideline: 5x retainer; five‑year compliance window .
  • Anti‑hedging/anti‑pledging policy prohibits hedging and pledging; exceptions only with pre‑approved demonstration of financial capacity and absence of MNPI .

Employment & Contracts

Severance and change‑in‑control terms applicable during Malik’s NEO tenure (as of 12/31/2022):

ScenarioCash/BenefitsEquity TreatmentEstimated Value (12/31/2022)
Termination without cause (no CIC)12 months base salary continuation + 12 months continued health/other benefits$1,263,508
Death or Disability (no CIC)Full vesting of unvested equity; PRSUs at target$16,145,271
CIC Termination2x base salary + 2x target annual bonus; 24 months benefitsFull vesting; PRSUs at target$5,489,367 (cash/benefits) + $16,145,271 (equity)

Pension/Deferred Compensation:

  • Present value of accumulated benefit under “The Executive Plan”: $433,475 (deferred compensation, no longer company contributions) .
  • Malik Retirement Benefit Agreement (frozen Nov 2020): Present value $5,342,449; no further accruals .

Fixed Compensation (Director Program Design and Attendance Context)

  • Board and committees composed largely of independent directors; standing committees operate under written charters; regular risk oversight and governance reviews .
  • Independent Chair; extensive executive sessions and access to management/advisors .

Performance Compensation (Shareholder Feedback and Program Evolution)

  • 2024 Say‑on‑Pay was disappointing; feedback focused primarily on transitional consulting arrangement with former Executive Chairman; arrangement ended June 30, 2025; program adjustments made (negative discretion on 2024 payout; tougher EBITDA max; reduced regulatory metric weight; personal objective added) .

Related Party Transactions (Conflict of Interest Signals)

ItemAmount/DetailNotes
Payments to counsel for Mr. Malik~$473,000 (Jan 1, 2024–Oct 20, 2025); anticipated ~$183,000 additional in 2025Related to previously disclosed drug pricing matters; indemnification agreements
Payment to Mr. Malik (Restoration Plan/profit sharing)~$622,000 (2025)Relates to company profit sharing contributions and prior participation in 401(k) Restoration Plan
Advisory roleMalik advises on operational matters; Board may consider short-term extension upon retirementTerms include continued vesting in equity awards; Audit Committee to review under related party transactions policy

Compensation Peer Group (Benchmarking)

2024 peer group used for executive pay benchmarking included Abbott, Amgen, Bausch Health, Baxter, Biogen, Bristol‑Myers, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Novartis, Organon, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Teva, Zoetis. In 2025, Eli Lilly was removed due to market cap and Sandoz Pharmaceuticals added .

Governance Assessment

  • Independence: Malik is not independent under NASDAQ rules; as a former President and ongoing advisor (with potential continued vesting), this raises alignment and conflict considerations for board effectiveness. RED FLAG .
  • Committee leadership: Chaired Science & Technology during re‑establishment, adding scientific oversight to the board; committee activity was regular in 2024–2025 .
  • Ownership alignment: Significant shareholdings and options; director ownership guidelines and anti‑hedging/pledging policies support alignment, but continuation of vesting tied to advisory role should be closely monitored. Mixed signal .
  • Related party exposure: Legal fee advancements and restoration plan payments, plus contemplated advisory extension with equity vesting, are notable and require rigorous Audit Committee oversight. RED FLAG .
  • Shareholder sentiment: 2024 Say‑on‑Pay disappointment prompted program changes; governance responsiveness evident, but prior concerns underscore the need for sustained pay‑for‑performance rigor .
  • Attendance and engagement: Board met frequently; independent directors held multiple executive sessions; Malik’s attendance rate not specifically disclosed; ensure exit/transition does not impair S&T oversight continuity .

Implication: For investors, Malik’s deep operational expertise added value in science/technology oversight; however, non‑independence status and related‑party arrangements (including potential advisory role with continued vesting) represent governance risks that can affect confidence. Continued transparency and strict application of related‑party and clawback policies, along with board refresh, mitigate but do not eliminate these risks .