WP
Warby Parker Inc. (WRBY)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 delivered double‑digit growth and first GAAP profitable quarter: net revenue $223.8M (+11.9% YoY) and diluted EPS $0.03; adjusted EBITDA margin expanded ~190 bps YoY to 13.1% .
- Mixed vs estimates: revenue modestly missed S&P Global consensus ($223.8M vs $225.4M, −$1.6M)* while Primary EPS beat ($0.142 vs $0.112)*; company-reported diluted EPS was $0.03 .
- FY25 guidance revised lower on tariff/macro uncertainty: revenue $869–$886M (from $878–$893M), adjusted EBITDA $91–$97M (10.5%–11.0% margin); Q2 guide $211–$214M revenue, $20–$22M adj. EBITDA .
- Key catalysts: detailed tariff mitigation (supply chain reallocation, selective pricing, opex discipline), accelerating e‑commerce growth, and ongoing insurance integration and store openings; post‑quarter, announced Google partnership for AI‑powered eyewear .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Achieved first GAAP positive net income as a public company ($3.5M) driven by expense leverage on higher revenue .
- Adjusted EBITDA margin expanded to 13.1% (+190 bps YoY) on non‑marketing SG&A leverage; e‑commerce posted highest quarterly growth since 2021 .
- Active customers accelerated for the 7th straight quarter to 2.57M (+8.7% YoY), with average revenue per customer up 4.8% to $310; management emphasized strong customer acquisition efficiency and AI‑driven personalization roadmap (“excited about early test results”) .
Specific quotes:
- “We opened 11 net new stores, exceeded profitability expectations, drove the highest e‑commerce growth we've seen since 2021…” — Co‑CEO Neil Blumenthal .
- “We believe our brand’s strength, commitment to innovation…reinforce [our] ability to continue taking share…” — Co‑CEO Dave Gilboa .
- “These results underscore our disciplined execution and our continued ability to scale sustainably.” — CFO Steve Miller .
What Went Wrong
- Revenue slightly below consensus and modest gross margin contraction (56.3% vs 56.7% YoY) from contact lens mix and fixed cost deleverage from new stores; tariff uncertainty prompting more conservative FY guide .
- FY25 revenue guidance reduced by ~1% at midpoint (to $869–$886M) and margin impact estimated at 200–300 bps from tariffs despite mitigation efforts .
- Management cited increased volatility in consumer sentiment and weather disruptions (operational hours lost +68% YoY) affecting traffic patterns in early Q2 setup .
Financial Results
Segment/KPI details:
- Product mix and growth
- Glasses revenue growth YoY: +9.1%
- Contacts revenue growth YoY: +25.1%; share of revenue: 9.2% → 10.3%
- Eye care (exams) growth YoY: ~+40%; share of revenue: 4.7% → 5.8%
Note: “—” indicates not disclosed in the referenced press materials for that prior period.
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Strategic priorities: “Serve customers…invest in growth…actively mitigate tariffs and maintain a strong financial profile.” — Co‑CEO Neil Blumenthal .
- Pricing strategy: “Targeted…price adjustments…still delivering exceptional value…entry $95 price point maintained.” — Co‑CEO David Gilboa .
- Tariff mitigation scale: “Gross impact ~$45–$50M…we believe we will mitigate the substantial majority, if not all.” — CFO Steve Miller .
- E‑commerce and AI: “Highest quarterly growth since 2021…excited about early test results from new AI‑powered personalization features.” — Co‑CEO Neil Blumenthal .
- Insurance value: “Insurance customers…spend more…select progressives at a higher rate…and return more frequently.” — Co‑CEO David Gilboa .
Q&A Highlights
- Guidance conservatism: Management lowered FY revenue growth (13%–15% vs 14%–16%) reflecting macro/tariff uncertainty and potential elongation of purchase cycles; March ended strong; April variability improved into May .
- Margin cadence: Expect similar shape to last year (highest margin Q1, lowest Q4); confident in sustaining 100–200 bps annual adj. EBITDA expansion long term .
- Tariff buckets: Mitigation from supply reallocation, selective pricing, and opex cuts; aggregate plan targets offsetting ~$45–$50M impact; did not break out per bucket .
- E‑commerce trajectory: Strength in traffic/conversion; contacts online channel; AI‑driven recommendations aiding purchase without home try‑on .
- Target shop‑in‑shops: 5 stores in H2; Warby staff and systems; modeled similar unit economics; incremental to stand‑alone growth .
Estimates Context
Interpretation:
- Revenue was a modest miss vs consensus; EPS beat on S&P “Primary EPS” basis, while company’s GAAP diluted EPS printed $0.03. Consensus EBITDA definitions may differ from company’s adjusted EBITDA; on company‑reported basis, adjusted EBITDA exceeded consensus. Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
FY 2025 consensus context:
- Revenue: $873.1M*; EBITDA: $100.0M*; Primary EPS: $0.369*; Target Price: $22.17*.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Mix and omnichannel strategy working: glasses, contacts, and exams all growing; retail remains ~70% of mix with e‑commerce re‑accelerating, supported by AI personalization and store density halo .
- Margin playbook intact despite tariffs: non‑marketing SG&A leverage drove Q1 flow‑through; management targets 100–150 bps adj. EBITDA expansion in FY25 even under tariff headwinds .
- Near‑term setup: Q2 revenue/EBITDA guide embeds mitigation phasing; watch gross margin trajectory (−200–300 bps potential for FY), pricing elasticity, and insurance utilization ramp .
- Strategic catalysts: Target pilot, Versant integration, accelerated supply chain diversification, and post‑quarter Google XR partnership expand optionality and narrative beyond near‑term macro/tariff caution .
- Estimate implications: Modest revenue trimming and margin pressure likely; however, adj. EBITDA execution could support upward revisions if mitigation outperforms and pricing/mix holds. Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Trading lens: Balance conservative FY guide and tariff risks against improving unit economics, cash generation ($13.2M FCF in Q1), and first GAAP profitable quarter; catalysts include mitigation updates and Q2 delivery vs guide .