Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Jason S. Armstrong

Chief Financial Officer at COMCASTCOMCAST
Executive

About Jason S. Armstrong

Jason S. Armstrong has served as Comcast’s Chief Financial Officer since January 6, 2023; he previously was Deputy CFO (2022) and Treasurer (2020), and earlier CFO of Sky Limited and SVP/Head of Investor Relations and Finance at Comcast. Prior to joining Comcast in 2014, he spent 13 years at Goldman Sachs as Managing Director leading the Cable & Telecommunications Research Group; he holds a B.S. in Economics from Duke University and was age 46 at appointment . During 2024, the company grew revenue 1.8% to $123.7B, increased Adjusted EBITDA to $38.1B, and generated $12.5B of free cash flow; cumulative TSR measured from 2019 year-end stood at 94.53, metrics that inform CFO incentive design and evaluation .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Comcast CorporationChief Financial Officer2023–present Led finance, planning, capital allocation, investor relations and treasury; supported broadband network upgrades, footprint expansion, Epic Universe construction; returned $13.5B capital to shareholders .
Comcast CorporationDeputy Chief Financial Officer2022–2023 Oversaw treasury and enterprise finance, capital formation and allocation across Cable, NBCU, Sky .
Comcast CorporationTreasurer2020–2023 Managed liquidity, capital markets and credit-related matters .
Sky Limited (Comcast)Chief Financial OfficerNot disclosedCFO responsibilities at Sky (Comcast subsidiary), enhancing segment financial management .
Comcast CorporationSVP/Head of Investor Relations and FinanceNot disclosedLed IR and finance, strengthening market communication and financial discipline .

External Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Goldman SachsManaging Director; Leader, Cable & Telecommunications Research Group13 years (ended 2014) Deep sector expertise; capital markets and analytical rigor brought to Comcast finance leadership .

Fixed Compensation

Metric20232024
Base Salary ($)1,789,615 1,996,154 (increased to $2.0M effective Jan 2024)
Stock Awards – PSUs Grant-Date Fair Value ($)3,266,371 6,619,338
Option Awards – Grant-Date Fair Value ($)2,000,033 2,125,001
Annual Cash Bonus Paid ($)4,528,767 4,351,616
All Other Compensation ($)10,000 10,000
Total ($)11,594,786 15,102,108

Performance Compensation

ElementMetricWeightingTargetActual 2024Payout/Vesting
Annual Cash BonusAdjusted EBITDA35% Not disclosed33% weighted achievement contribution; metric range $36.598–$42.378B Contributed to total bonus payout; 2024 bonus paid $4,351,616 (109% of target)
Annual Cash BonusFree Cash Flow25% Not disclosed37% weighted achievement contribution; metric range $11.585–$17.719B As above; total payout 109%
Annual Cash BonusRevenue10% Not disclosed9% weighted achievement contribution; metric range $119.212–$138.036B As above; total payout 109%
Annual Cash BonusOperating Performance Goals15% Holistic15% determined by committee (goals include alignment with long-range plans, collaboration, agility) Included in 109% payout
Annual Cash BonusStakeholder & Sustainability Initiatives15% Holistic15% determined by committee (digital opportunity, sustainability, culture) Included in 109% payout
PSUs (3-year)ROIC (absolute, averaged)50% Target set by committee (undisclosed) Measured over 2024–2026; prior 2022–2024 PSU ROIC achieved 11% (payout 200%) Cliff vests at 3 years; payout 50–200% per metric; overall PSU payout subject to TSR modifier ±25%, capped if absolute TSR negative
PSUs (3-year)Relative Adjusted EPS Growth vs S&P 10050% Median = 100% payout Measured over 2024–2026; prior 2022–2024 achieved 70th percentile (payout 180%) As above; TSR modifier applied; max total PSU payout 250%
Options (5-year ratable)Stock Price Appreciation100% performance-based (price dependency) N/AN/A20% vesting each year years 1–5; net-settled

Grant specifics (2024 awards):

  • PSUs granted 3/1/2024: threshold 27,928; target 148,950; max 372,375; grant-date fair value $6,619,338 .
  • Options granted 3/1/2024: 223,920 at $42.80 exercise price; grant-date fair value $2,125,001; vest 20% annually over 5 years .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

ItemDetail
Beneficial Ownership (as of Feb 28, 2025)596,756 Class A shares; less than 1% of class
Options exercisable on/within 60 days (Feb 28, 2025)560,890
Stock units vesting on/within 60 days (Feb 28, 2025)6,382
Unvested RSUs (Dec 31, 2024)53,250; market value $1,998,473 at $37.53/share
Unearned PSUs (Dec 31, 2024)577,137; payout value $21,659,952 at $37.53/share
2024 Options outstanding (grant)223,920 at $42.80; unexercisable until scheduled vest
Stock Ownership Guideline3x base salary; in compliance (6-year phase-in policy applies for new/higher thresholds)
Hedging/PledgingProhibited for executive officers and directors; no shares hedged or pledged

Employment Terms

  • Agreement term: Secures employment through December 31, 2027 (entered into January 6, 2023 upon CFO appointment); initial salary $1.8M and target bonus 200% of salary; severance aligned to executive policy . In 2024, base salary increased to $2.0M; target bonus remains 200% of salary .
  • Non-compete and non-solicit: 1 year post-termination (other than company without cause or executive with good reason), plus confidentiality covenants .
  • Severance (as of Dec 31, 2024): If terminated without cause/with good reason, 24 months base salary ($3.6M), 24 months bonus ($3.6M), current-year accrued bonus ($3,992,308), continued vesting for 12 months (unvested options $43,218; stock units $886,684), and health benefits continuation ($23,335) .
  • Change-in-control: No automatic single-trigger acceleration; Armstrong has no double-trigger equity acceleration in his agreement; committee retains discretion on acceleration .
  • Clawback: Incentive compensation recoupment policy compliant with SEC/Nasdaq rules .
  • Award timing: Annual equity grants on first business day in March; blackout practices observed around material filings .
  • Pension/SERP: None provided to NEOs .
  • Deferred compensation: Aggregate balance $12,679,715; 2024 aggregate earnings $1,128,394; no executive contributions in 2024 .

Say-on-Pay & Shareholder Feedback

  • 2024 say-on-pay approval: 89% of votes cast approved compensation program (reflecting design changes implemented in 2021) .
  • 2025 annual meeting outcomes: Say-on-pay approved (For 332,155,225; Against 37,280,056; Abstain 1,173,730; broker non-votes 22,704,817) .
  • Compensation Committee uses Korn Ferry as independent consultant; reviewed peer groups, competitiveness, incentive design, dilution; no conflicts identified .

Compensation Peer Group

  • Core 2024 peer group: Alphabet, AT&T, Charter Communications, Fox, Meta Platforms, Netflix, Paramount Global, T-Mobile US, The Walt Disney Company, Verizon, Warner Bros. Discovery .

Performance & Track Record

  • 2024 NEO performance assessment for Armstrong: Led finance, planning and capital strategies; supported investments in broadband upgrades and Epic Universe; maintained balance sheet strength and liquidity; returned $13.5B through dividends and buybacks .
  • Company performance context: Connectivity revenue consistent at $81.3B with Adjusted EBITDA +1.9% to $32.8B; Content & Experiences revenue +4.4% to $45.1B with flat Adjusted EBITDA; dividend increased to $1.32 per share annualized in January 2025 .

Performance Compensation Structure Analysis

  • Mix shift: 2024 equity mix increased PSUs to ~75% and reduced options to ~25%; in 2025, annual equity program will consist entirely of PSUs, increasing pay-for-performance linkage .
  • Short-term bonus rigor: Quantitative financial metrics (Revenue, Adjusted EBITDA, Free Cash Flow) at 70% weight and qualitative operating and stakeholder goals at 30%; maximum payout capped at 192.5% .
  • PSU metrics rigor: ROIC (absolute) and Relative Adjusted EPS (vs S&P 100), with TSR modifier ±25% and absolute TSR cap; max total payout 250% .
  • Governance best practices: No option repricing; no excise/tax gross-ups; no single-trigger change-in-control vesting; robust ownership requirements; hedging/pledging prohibitions .

Equity Ownership & Insider Activity Signals

  • 2024 option activity: Armstrong exercised 68,200 options (value realized $1,032,207) and had 35,014 stock awards vest (value realized $1,480,586), typical for scheduled vesting and liquidity management .
  • Near-term potential supply: 6,382 stock units vest within 60 days of Feb 28, 2025; significant PSU tranche of 577,137 scheduled for 2027 subject to performance .
  • Alignment: In-compliance with 3x salary ownership requirement; hedging/pledging prohibited; no shares of executives/directors hedged or pledged .

Employment Terms Table (Key Economics)

ProvisionTerms
Base Salary$2.0M effective Jan 2024 (initial CFO agreement set at $1.8M)
Target Bonus200% of base salary
Severance (WC/WGR)24 months base + 24 months bonus + current-year accrued bonus; 12 months continued vesting (options/units); health continuation
Non-Compete/Non-Solicit1 year post-termination (except company without cause or executive with good reason)
Change-in-ControlNo automatic acceleration; committee discretion; Armstrong has no CiC equity triggers
ClawbackSEC/Nasdaq-compliant recoupment policy

Investment Implications

  • Alignment appears strong: Higher PSU weighting (and 2025 all-PSU policy) with ROIC, relative EPS, and TSR modifier enhances pay-for-performance and long-term value creation linkage; ownership guidelines and hedging/pledging prohibitions reduce misalignment risk .
  • Retention risk looks contained: Contract secured through 2027, meaningful unvested equity (PSUs/RSUs) and option schedules, plus severance protections suggest stable tenure; non-compete and non-solicit further mitigate transition risk .
  • Selling pressure: 2024 option exercises and routine vesting are normal course; with guidelines compliance and prohibitions on pledging/hedging, systemic selling pressure risk is limited; watch PSU vest outcomes in 2027 for potential supply .
  • Governance and shareholder support: Robust practices and strong say-on-pay approvals (89% in 2024; 2025 approved) support continuity of incentive structures; peer group methodology and consultant independence add credibility to compensation benchmarking .