Sign in

Jason S. Armstrong

Chief Financial Officer at COMCASTCOMCAST
Executive

About Jason S. Armstrong

Jason S. Armstrong has served as Comcast’s Chief Financial Officer since January 6, 2023; he previously was Deputy CFO (2022) and Treasurer (2020), and earlier CFO of Sky Limited and SVP/Head of Investor Relations and Finance at Comcast. Prior to joining Comcast in 2014, he spent 13 years at Goldman Sachs as Managing Director leading the Cable & Telecommunications Research Group; he holds a B.S. in Economics from Duke University and was age 46 at appointment . During 2024, the company grew revenue 1.8% to $123.7B, increased Adjusted EBITDA to $38.1B, and generated $12.5B of free cash flow; cumulative TSR measured from 2019 year-end stood at 94.53, metrics that inform CFO incentive design and evaluation .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Comcast CorporationChief Financial Officer2023–present Led finance, planning, capital allocation, investor relations and treasury; supported broadband network upgrades, footprint expansion, Epic Universe construction; returned $13.5B capital to shareholders .
Comcast CorporationDeputy Chief Financial Officer2022–2023 Oversaw treasury and enterprise finance, capital formation and allocation across Cable, NBCU, Sky .
Comcast CorporationTreasurer2020–2023 Managed liquidity, capital markets and credit-related matters .
Sky Limited (Comcast)Chief Financial OfficerNot disclosedCFO responsibilities at Sky (Comcast subsidiary), enhancing segment financial management .
Comcast CorporationSVP/Head of Investor Relations and FinanceNot disclosedLed IR and finance, strengthening market communication and financial discipline .

External Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Goldman SachsManaging Director; Leader, Cable & Telecommunications Research Group13 years (ended 2014) Deep sector expertise; capital markets and analytical rigor brought to Comcast finance leadership .

Fixed Compensation

Metric20232024
Base Salary ($)1,789,615 1,996,154 (increased to $2.0M effective Jan 2024)
Stock Awards – PSUs Grant-Date Fair Value ($)3,266,371 6,619,338
Option Awards – Grant-Date Fair Value ($)2,000,033 2,125,001
Annual Cash Bonus Paid ($)4,528,767 4,351,616
All Other Compensation ($)10,000 10,000
Total ($)11,594,786 15,102,108

Performance Compensation

ElementMetricWeightingTargetActual 2024Payout/Vesting
Annual Cash BonusAdjusted EBITDA35% Not disclosed33% weighted achievement contribution; metric range $36.598–$42.378B Contributed to total bonus payout; 2024 bonus paid $4,351,616 (109% of target)
Annual Cash BonusFree Cash Flow25% Not disclosed37% weighted achievement contribution; metric range $11.585–$17.719B As above; total payout 109%
Annual Cash BonusRevenue10% Not disclosed9% weighted achievement contribution; metric range $119.212–$138.036B As above; total payout 109%
Annual Cash BonusOperating Performance Goals15% Holistic15% determined by committee (goals include alignment with long-range plans, collaboration, agility) Included in 109% payout
Annual Cash BonusStakeholder & Sustainability Initiatives15% Holistic15% determined by committee (digital opportunity, sustainability, culture) Included in 109% payout
PSUs (3-year)ROIC (absolute, averaged)50% Target set by committee (undisclosed) Measured over 2024–2026; prior 2022–2024 PSU ROIC achieved 11% (payout 200%) Cliff vests at 3 years; payout 50–200% per metric; overall PSU payout subject to TSR modifier ±25%, capped if absolute TSR negative
PSUs (3-year)Relative Adjusted EPS Growth vs S&P 10050% Median = 100% payout Measured over 2024–2026; prior 2022–2024 achieved 70th percentile (payout 180%) As above; TSR modifier applied; max total PSU payout 250%
Options (5-year ratable)Stock Price Appreciation100% performance-based (price dependency) N/AN/A20% vesting each year years 1–5; net-settled

Grant specifics (2024 awards):

  • PSUs granted 3/1/2024: threshold 27,928; target 148,950; max 372,375; grant-date fair value $6,619,338 .
  • Options granted 3/1/2024: 223,920 at $42.80 exercise price; grant-date fair value $2,125,001; vest 20% annually over 5 years .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

ItemDetail
Beneficial Ownership (as of Feb 28, 2025)596,756 Class A shares; less than 1% of class
Options exercisable on/within 60 days (Feb 28, 2025)560,890
Stock units vesting on/within 60 days (Feb 28, 2025)6,382
Unvested RSUs (Dec 31, 2024)53,250; market value $1,998,473 at $37.53/share
Unearned PSUs (Dec 31, 2024)577,137; payout value $21,659,952 at $37.53/share
2024 Options outstanding (grant)223,920 at $42.80; unexercisable until scheduled vest
Stock Ownership Guideline3x base salary; in compliance (6-year phase-in policy applies for new/higher thresholds)
Hedging/PledgingProhibited for executive officers and directors; no shares hedged or pledged

Employment Terms

  • Agreement term: Secures employment through December 31, 2027 (entered into January 6, 2023 upon CFO appointment); initial salary $1.8M and target bonus 200% of salary; severance aligned to executive policy . In 2024, base salary increased to $2.0M; target bonus remains 200% of salary .
  • Non-compete and non-solicit: 1 year post-termination (other than company without cause or executive with good reason), plus confidentiality covenants .
  • Severance (as of Dec 31, 2024): If terminated without cause/with good reason, 24 months base salary ($3.6M), 24 months bonus ($3.6M), current-year accrued bonus ($3,992,308), continued vesting for 12 months (unvested options $43,218; stock units $886,684), and health benefits continuation ($23,335) .
  • Change-in-control: No automatic single-trigger acceleration; Armstrong has no double-trigger equity acceleration in his agreement; committee retains discretion on acceleration .
  • Clawback: Incentive compensation recoupment policy compliant with SEC/Nasdaq rules .
  • Award timing: Annual equity grants on first business day in March; blackout practices observed around material filings .
  • Pension/SERP: None provided to NEOs .
  • Deferred compensation: Aggregate balance $12,679,715; 2024 aggregate earnings $1,128,394; no executive contributions in 2024 .

Say-on-Pay & Shareholder Feedback

  • 2024 say-on-pay approval: 89% of votes cast approved compensation program (reflecting design changes implemented in 2021) .
  • 2025 annual meeting outcomes: Say-on-pay approved (For 332,155,225; Against 37,280,056; Abstain 1,173,730; broker non-votes 22,704,817) .
  • Compensation Committee uses Korn Ferry as independent consultant; reviewed peer groups, competitiveness, incentive design, dilution; no conflicts identified .

Compensation Peer Group

  • Core 2024 peer group: Alphabet, AT&T, Charter Communications, Fox, Meta Platforms, Netflix, Paramount Global, T-Mobile US, The Walt Disney Company, Verizon, Warner Bros. Discovery .

Performance & Track Record

  • 2024 NEO performance assessment for Armstrong: Led finance, planning and capital strategies; supported investments in broadband upgrades and Epic Universe; maintained balance sheet strength and liquidity; returned $13.5B through dividends and buybacks .
  • Company performance context: Connectivity revenue consistent at $81.3B with Adjusted EBITDA +1.9% to $32.8B; Content & Experiences revenue +4.4% to $45.1B with flat Adjusted EBITDA; dividend increased to $1.32 per share annualized in January 2025 .

Performance Compensation Structure Analysis

  • Mix shift: 2024 equity mix increased PSUs to ~75% and reduced options to ~25%; in 2025, annual equity program will consist entirely of PSUs, increasing pay-for-performance linkage .
  • Short-term bonus rigor: Quantitative financial metrics (Revenue, Adjusted EBITDA, Free Cash Flow) at 70% weight and qualitative operating and stakeholder goals at 30%; maximum payout capped at 192.5% .
  • PSU metrics rigor: ROIC (absolute) and Relative Adjusted EPS (vs S&P 100), with TSR modifier ±25% and absolute TSR cap; max total payout 250% .
  • Governance best practices: No option repricing; no excise/tax gross-ups; no single-trigger change-in-control vesting; robust ownership requirements; hedging/pledging prohibitions .

Equity Ownership & Insider Activity Signals

  • 2024 option activity: Armstrong exercised 68,200 options (value realized $1,032,207) and had 35,014 stock awards vest (value realized $1,480,586), typical for scheduled vesting and liquidity management .
  • Near-term potential supply: 6,382 stock units vest within 60 days of Feb 28, 2025; significant PSU tranche of 577,137 scheduled for 2027 subject to performance .
  • Alignment: In-compliance with 3x salary ownership requirement; hedging/pledging prohibited; no shares of executives/directors hedged or pledged .

Employment Terms Table (Key Economics)

ProvisionTerms
Base Salary$2.0M effective Jan 2024 (initial CFO agreement set at $1.8M)
Target Bonus200% of base salary
Severance (WC/WGR)24 months base + 24 months bonus + current-year accrued bonus; 12 months continued vesting (options/units); health continuation
Non-Compete/Non-Solicit1 year post-termination (except company without cause or executive with good reason)
Change-in-ControlNo automatic acceleration; committee discretion; Armstrong has no CiC equity triggers
ClawbackSEC/Nasdaq-compliant recoupment policy

Investment Implications

  • Alignment appears strong: Higher PSU weighting (and 2025 all-PSU policy) with ROIC, relative EPS, and TSR modifier enhances pay-for-performance and long-term value creation linkage; ownership guidelines and hedging/pledging prohibitions reduce misalignment risk .
  • Retention risk looks contained: Contract secured through 2027, meaningful unvested equity (PSUs/RSUs) and option schedules, plus severance protections suggest stable tenure; non-compete and non-solicit further mitigate transition risk .
  • Selling pressure: 2024 option exercises and routine vesting are normal course; with guidelines compliance and prohibitions on pledging/hedging, systemic selling pressure risk is limited; watch PSU vest outcomes in 2027 for potential supply .
  • Governance and shareholder support: Robust practices and strong say-on-pay approvals (89% in 2024; 2025 approved) support continuity of incentive structures; peer group methodology and consultant independence add credibility to compensation benchmarking .