Sign in

    Conocophillips (COP)

    Q4 2024 Earnings Summary

    Reported on Feb 7, 2025 (Before Market Open)
    Pre-Earnings Price$100.21Last close (Feb 5, 2025)
    Post-Earnings Price$98.89Open (Feb 6, 2025)
    Price Change
    $-1.32(-1.32%)
    • ConocoPhillips is achieving significant production growth and efficiency gains without increasing capital expenditures in the Lower 48, primarily due to operational improvements and synergies from the Marathon acquisition. The company delivered 15% more scope with similar rig and frac activity levels in 2024 and expects to continue this trend by applying their efficient development model to the acquired Marathon assets, resulting in a $1.4 billion reduction in pro forma capital spending for 2025 in the Lower 48. ,
    • ConocoPhillips anticipates substantial future cash flow growth from a series of long-cycle projects coming online between 2026 and 2029, leading to approximately $3.5 billion in incremental CFO and $6 billion in incremental annual sustaining free cash flow relative to 2025 at certain price assumptions. These projects, including NFE, Port Arthur, NFS, and Willow, are expected to start up sequentially and significantly boost the company's cash flows.
    • ConocoPhillips maintains a strong commitment to shareholder returns, targeting $10 billion in capital returns to shareholders in 2025 despite lower commodity prices, with potential to increase returns if prices rise. The company has a strong balance sheet with over $7.5 billion in cash and long-term investments and expects significant cash flow torque, with a rule of thumb of $400 million in CFO for every $1 change in WTI price.
    • High capital expenditures in 2025, particularly due to peak spending on long-cycle projects estimated at around $3 billion, may strain free cash flow and impact shareholder returns.
    • Exposure to regulatory and geopolitical risks, including potential tariffs from new White House initiatives, could negatively affect the company's operations and profitability, especially in areas like exports from Canada to the U.S.
    • The company's increasing production growth, which exceeds low single-digit targets due to operational efficiencies, may contribute to oversupply in the market, potentially leading to lower commodity prices and affecting COP's margins.
    MetricYoY ChangeReason

    Total Revenue

    -2.4% (from $15,307M to $14,737M)

    Lower realized commodity prices and reduced volumes led to a modest decline in revenue compared to Q4 2023, with the previous period benefiting from higher prices that are not sustained in Q4 2024.

    Operating Income (EBIT)

    -20.3% (from $3,484M to $2,779M)

    A significant drop in EBIT reflects increased operating expenses, higher DD&A costs, and lower realized prices compared to Q4 2023, where earnings were boosted by relatively favorable cost conditions and asset disposition gains, a benefit that was less pronounced in Q4 2024.

    Net Income

    -23.4% (from $3,007M to $2,306M)

    The decline in net income stems from lower operating profitability due to reduced revenues and higher costs (including increased depreciation and operating expenses) compared to Q4 2023, thereby compressing income and affecting profitability metrics for Q4 2024.

    Basic EPS

    -24.6% (from $2.52 to $1.90)

    Basic EPS fell sharply as a direct consequence of the drop in net income and lower margins, reflecting the combined impact of unfavorable commodity price trends and cost inflation compared to the prior period.

    China's Revenue

    90% decline (from $281M to $19M)

    A dramatic decline over 90% YoY indicates severe pressure in the China market, largely due to markedly lower commodity prices and possibly region-specific challenges, contrasting strongly with the much higher revenue level seen in Q4 2023.

    Net Change in Cash

    Swing from -$3,177M to +$383M

    The turnaround in cash flow is attributed to substantially higher operating cash flows, favorable working capital adjustments, and a reduction in net investing outflows relative to Q4 2023, which reversed a negative cash change into a positive result in Q4 2024.

    MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange

    Production

    Q4 2024

    1.99M to 2.03M BOE/d

    no current guidance

    no current guidance

    APLNG distributions

    Q4 2024

    over $200M

    no current guidance

    no current guidance

    CapEx

    Q4 2024

    consistent with prior guidance

    no current guidance

    no current guidance

    Production

    FY 2024

    1.94M to 1.95M BOE/d

    no current guidance

    no current guidance

    APLNG distributions

    FY 2024

    $1.5B

    no current guidance

    no current guidance

    Operating costs (OpEx)

    FY 2024

    unchanged

    no current guidance

    no current guidance

    Production

    Q1 2025

    no prior guidance

    2.34M to 2.38M BOE/d

    no prior guidance

    Production

    FY 2025

    no prior guidance

    2.34M to 2.38M BOE/d

    no prior guidance

    Capital expenditures (CapEx)

    FY 2025

    no prior guidance

    $12.9B

    no prior guidance

    Adjusted operating costs

    FY 2025

    no prior guidance

    $10.9B to $11.1B

    no prior guidance

    Exploration expenses

    FY 2025

    no prior guidance

    $300M

    no prior guidance

    DD&A

    FY 2025

    no prior guidance

    $11.3B to $11.5B

    no prior guidance

    Corporate segment net loss

    FY 2025

    no prior guidance

    $1.1B

    no prior guidance

    Effective corporate tax rate

    FY 2025

    no prior guidance

    36% to 37%

    no prior guidance

    Effective cash tax rate

    FY 2025

    no prior guidance

    35% to 36%

    no prior guidance

    APLNG distributions

    FY 2025

    no prior guidance

    $1B

    no prior guidance

    Turnarounds

    FY 2025

    no prior guidance

    20,000 BOE/d impact (highest in Q2 2025 & Q3 2025)

    no prior guidance

    Shareholder returns

    FY 2025

    no prior guidance

    $10B

    no prior guidance

    TopicPrevious MentionsCurrent PeriodTrend

    Marathon acquisition synergies

    Initially targeted $500M in synergies, raised to $1B in Q3 2024 ; no mention in Q1 2024

    Expecting more than $1B of run-rate synergies by end of 2025; $500M of the $1.4B CapEx reduction from Marathon synergy

    Synergy target reinforced with clearer cost savings and stronger conviction

    Production growth and efficiency (Lower 48)

    Saw 3–6% growth in Q1–Q3 2024; efficiency gains cited every quarter, with larger well pads and frac efficiency

    Delivered 5% growth for the year, achieved by doing 15% more scope with similar activity counts; synergy from Marathon reduces CapEx while maintaining growth

    Consistent growth; ongoing focus on efficiency and synergy

    LNG expansions

    Q1–Q3 2024: building 10–15 MTPA portfolio; pursuing projects like Port Arthur and Qatar; signing regas and sales agreements in Europe/Asia

    Maintaining goal of 10–15 MTPA. Highlighted Port Arthur Phase 1 and potential Phase 2; bullish on North American gas volumes but moving gas to premium markets

    Steady expansion; continuing global LNG push and portfolio build-out

    Willow project

    Q1–Q3 2024: on track for 2029 first oil; largest winter construction years in 2024–25; FID made in 2023

    2025 peak spending, with winter construction slightly ahead of plan; still targeting first oil by 2029; emphasizing importance of future exploration

    Project on schedule; construction milestones on track

    Surmont ramp-up

    Q1–Q3 2024: ramping up Pad 267, strong post-turnaround performance, adding a new pad every 12–18 months

    Mentioned advancing new pads; contributed to 123% organic reserve replacement; complete ownership provides more development control

    Continued strong ramp; further pad development

    Montney

    Q1 2024: reached a new record, up 20% from prior quarter; Q2 2024: averaged 43 MBOED, more than double YOY

    No mention in Q4 2024

    No new mention; overshadowed by other priorities

    Saguaro LNG project

    Q1 2024: no mention; Q2 2024: regulatory pause impacting FID ; Q3 2024: no mention

    No mention in Q4 2024

    No updates on delays

    Potential oversupply (oil/LNG)

    Q1–Q2 2024: no mention; Q3 2024: warned of potential oversupply around 2027–2028 for LNG, but long-term bullish on demand

    No mention in Q4 2024

    No updates; earlier caution not reiterated

    Capital expenditure

    Q1–Q3 2024: guided $11–$11.5B for 2024; synergy-driven reductions in Lower 48; less than $13B planned for 2025

    $12.9B planned for 2025; peak long-cycle spend on Willow (~$3B) offset by $1.4B cuts in Lower 48, citing synergies and deflation

    Synergies drive lower CapEx; big spend on Willow in 2025

    Commodity price volatility

    Q1 2024: reiterated $9B shareholder return; Q3 2024: indicated strong balance sheet can handle volatility

    Comfortable with a $10B shareholder return target for 2025, noting ~$400M in cash flow per $1 WTI swing; strong balance sheet buffers downside

    Maintained distribution commitment despite volatility

    Regulatory/geopolitical risks

    Q1–Q3 2024: no mention

    Flagged potential tariffs and White House initiatives; sized exposure to Surmont liquids heading to the U.S.

    New mention; monitoring tariffs and policy impacts

    Waha gas price constraints

    Q1–Q3 2024: highlighted negative pricing episodes; partial relief from Matterhorn pipeline; plan to move molecules to better markets

    Bullish on volumes but bearish on local gas prices; exploring LNG and domestic power markets to monetize Permian gas

    Ongoing constraints; evolving strategies for higher-value markets

    1. Cash Return Strategy
      Q: Why target $10B cash return in 2025?
      A: ConocoPhillips set a $10 billion cash return target for 2025 to demonstrate ongoing commitment to shareholder returns, even amid commodity price volatility. Despite a recent downdraft in WTI prices, management feels comfortable with this figure due to their strong balance sheet and significant flexibility. They highlight that for every $1 movement in WTI, cash flow changes by about $400 million, indicating significant upside potential. The company has over $7.5 billion in cash and long-term investments and is on track to dispose of $2 billion in non-core assets, providing further flexibility.

    2. Capital Expenditure Peak
      Q: Is major project CapEx peaking in 2025?
      A: Yes, 2025 is expected to be the peak year for major project capital expenditure, primarily due to the largest winter construction season for the Willow project. Beyond 2025, major project spend will step down each year as projects like NFE, Port Arthur, NFS, and Willow come online, delivering over $6 billion in free cash flow relative to the 2025 starting point.

    3. Lower 48 Production Growth
      Q: Will you accept current production growth?
      A: Production growth is an outcome of ConocoPhillips' efficiency-driven plans. The company aims to maintain efficient operations without whipsawing the organization. Despite significant growth, they haven't added any rig lines over the past few years, relying instead on operational efficiencies. The addition of Marathon assets has provided over 2 billion barrels of resources at sub-$40 cost of supply, allowing integration and optimization across key basins.

    4. Maintenance Capital Guidance
      Q: What's your maintenance CapEx number?
      A: Sustaining capital is somewhat hypothetical, but normalizing the 2025 capital of $12.9 billion, which includes $3 billion of pre-productive capital, suggests about $9 billion would be needed to stay flat in the current environment. Previously, the sustaining capital was estimated at $6 billion in a $40 world, but with acquisitions like Marathon and Surmont, it would now be closer to $7.5 billion under similar conditions.

    5. Lower 48 CapEx Reduction
      Q: What drives the $1.4B CapEx reduction?
      A: The $1.4 billion reduction in pro forma CapEx is driven by operational improvements, synergy captures from the Marathon acquisition, and modest deflation. Key factors include delivering 15% more scope with similar rig and frac activity by increasing efficiencies, capturing $500 million in synergies, and expecting around $200 million in deflation for 2025. At flat activity levels, the company expects to continue low single-digit production growth in the Lower 48.

    6. Willow Project Update
      Q: Update on Willow and spending plans?
      A: The Willow project is progressing well, with construction activities modestly ahead of plan. 2025 is the peak year of spend, with approximately one-third of annual capital spent in the first three to four months. Capital expenditure will stair-step down in subsequent quarters and years, with first oil expected in 2029. Recent executive orders have positively influenced exploration opportunities west of Willow, aligning with the company's long-term plans in Alaska.

    7. Reserve Replacement Ratio
      Q: How should we interpret your reserve replacement?
      A: The company achieved an organic reserve replacement ratio of 123%, despite falling prices causing downward revisions. This was driven by over 100% replacement in the Lower 48, initial bookings from the NFS project, and new pad developments at Surmont. Including acquisitions, the total reserve replacement ratio was 244%, increasing reserves to 7.8 billion BOE and improving the R/P ratio from 10 to 10.7 years. Additional PUD bookings from the Marathon assets are expected later this year.

    8. Divestiture Program Progress
      Q: Status of asset sales and Port Arthur equity?
      A: ConocoPhillips has signed PSAs for about $600 million of non-core Permian assets, expected to close in the first half of the year. The company anticipates achieving the majority of its $2 billion asset disposition target in 2025. Regarding Port Arthur Phase 1 equity, they are considering potential sell-downs but can be patient as the project progresses and de-risks without additional capital contributions.

    9. M&A Opportunities Outlook
      Q: Are M&A opportunities better or worse now?
      A: The landscape for M&A opportunities is changing, with fewer high-quality names available. While consolidation is expected to continue, opportunities must meet ConocoPhillips' strict criteria: fitting the financial framework, improving assets within their portfolio, and enhancing the company's 10-year plan. The unique acquisition of Marathon aligned with these criteria, but similar opportunities are becoming scarcer.

    10. Potential Tariff Impacts
      Q: How might tariffs affect your business?
      A: Potential tariffs could impact ConocoPhillips' sales of Surmont liquids into the U.S., which account for about half of their production from that asset. However, the company's diversified portfolio offers mitigation, with potential strengthening differentials in regions like Bakken and the Permian. While there are many moving parts, including foreign exchange rates, the company focuses on controlling what it can—producing low-cost supply volumes and optimizing value.

    11. Marathon Assets Inventory
      Q: What's the quality of Marathon's assets?
      A: The Marathon assets offer 2,000 competitive well locations with a cost of supply around $40 per barrel. Roughly half of these are in the Eagle Ford, with the remainder split between the Bakken and Delaware basins. Current well performance is strong, meeting type curve expectations, and there are opportunities to optimize and improve the combined inventory, such as increasing long laterals in the Bakken.

    12. Alaska's Nuna Project Impact
      Q: Will Nuna affect your production volumes?
      A: Yes, the Nuna project, which saw first oil in December after drilling initial wells, is expected to more than offset production declines in Alaska. Plans include drilling 8 more wells in 2025, contributing to modest growth over the next couple of years. Nuna exemplifies investment opportunities in Alaska, leveraging existing infrastructure and derisking targets before expanding.

    13. LNG Contracting Environment
      Q: Any changes in LNG demand outlook?
      A: The LNG market continues as expected, with Europe heavily dependent on LNG due to the cessation of the Russia-Ukraine pipeline gas deal, removing 1.5 Bcf of capacity. Cold winters are drawing down inventories, reinforcing the need for LNG. ConocoPhillips remains on track with its strategy to build out 10 to 15 MTPA of offtake capacity, including regasification facilities in Europe and sales into Asia.

    14. Domestic Power Demand Strategy
      Q: Plans for U.S. power demand opportunities?
      A: ConocoPhillips is exploring opportunities in domestic power demand, particularly supplying natural gas to data centers and potentially setting up power generation. With natural advantages like abundant gas supply, a commercial power desk, and land positions, the company is assessing growth opportunities. Any ventures must fit their financial framework and be competitive for capital, aligning with their broader LNG strategy.

    15. White House and Production Levels
      Q: Will you increase U.S. production per White House?
      A: The company is focused on driving efficiencies rather than accelerating production. Emphasis is on permitting reform and infrastructure development to enable faster movement within the regulatory environment. Improved permitting processes would enhance operational efficiency and potentially lead to sustained growth in U.S. production, but current plans remain centered on efficient, steady operations.