Testing how GPT-5's state-of-the-art reasoning and reduced hallucination rates perform against specialized financial AI infrastructure when analyzing complex equity research questions.
GPT-5, announced on August 7, 2025 and rolled out on August 12, represents OpenAI's most advanced language model to date. With a 94.6% accuracy rate on AIME 2025 mathematics benchmarks (without tools) and state-of-the-art performance across multiple domains, GPT-5 promises to revolutionize how AI handles complex analytical tasks.
The model introduces groundbreaking features including advanced “thinking” capabilities for complex problem-solving, state-of-the-art coding performance (74.9% on SWE-bench Verified), and significantly improved reliability. With browsing enabled, GPT-5-main shows 44% fewer responses with major factual errors compared to GPT-4o, while GPT-5-thinking demonstrates 78% fewer errors versus OpenAI o3—marking substantial improvements in accuracy.
But how does this cutting-edge model perform when tasked with the precision-critical world of financial analysis? We ran GPT-5 against our benchmark of complex equity research questions—and it failed on the most basic tasks where accuracy matters most: retrieving accurate numbers from financial statements, identifying the correct reporting period, and performing simple calculations on SEC filing data.
Our test questions cover essential equity research tasks: identifying European companies with S-1 filings, extracting quarterly financial metrics, analyzing revenue segments and growth drivers, and comparing share buybacks against dilution. Each question demands not just reasoning ability but access to accurate, up-to-date financial data—the true test of AI readiness for professional finance work.
Testing real-world financial analysis capabilities with current market data
Testing real-world financial analysis capabilities with current market data
Testing real-world financial analysis capabilities with current market data
Testing real-world financial analysis capabilities with current market data
Our comprehensive comparison reveals a critical insight: even GPT-5, with its dramatically reduced hallucination rates and advanced reasoning capabilities, struggles with the precision demands of financial analysis. While GPT-5 represents a significant leap forward in general AI capabilities, it still lacks the specialized infrastructure needed for accurate equity research.
The fundamental insight from our testing is clear: general-purpose AI, no matter how sophisticated, cannot match the accuracy of purpose-built, verticalized solutions for professional finance. Fintool isn't just another AI wrapper—it's a complete financial intelligence platform built from the ground up with direct SEC filing integration, verified financial databases, specialized financial context, and audit-ready citation systems. This verticalization is essential for professional investors who need absolute accuracy, not just impressive reasoning.
GPT-5's improvements in reasoning and reduced hallucinations are impressive for general tasks, but financial analysis demands more than just better reasoning. It requires real-time access to accurate market data, the ability to parse complex financial documents, and most importantly, the infrastructure to verify every claim against authoritative sources.
This comparison underscores why Fintool exists: to bridge the gap between advanced AI capabilities and the stringent accuracy requirements of professional finance. By combining GPT-5's reasoning power with specialized financial infrastructure, Fintool delivers both the sophistication of cutting-edge AI and the reliability that investment professionals demand.
See how purpose-built financial AI delivers accurate, verifiable insights that general-purpose models can't match.