Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Evan Scott

Chief Financial Officer at LOCKHEED MARTINLOCKHEED MARTIN
Executive

About Evan Scott

Evan T. Scott is Lockheed Martin’s Chief Financial Officer, appointed effective April 17, 2025; he is 48 and a 26‑year company veteran with deep finance leadership experience across business segments and corporate treasury . Lockheed Martin’s incentive programs emphasize pay-for-performance with metrics including Relative TSR, Free Cash Flow, ROIC, Segment Operating Profit, Sales, and strategic goals . Company performance context: 2024 sales were $71.0B (+5% YoY), segment operating profit $6.1B, free cash flow $5.3B, and backlog $176.0B, underpinning compensation outcomes and value creation .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic impact
Lockheed MartinCFO, Missiles and Fire Control (MFC)2024–2025Led segment finance and operations as elected officer
Lockheed MartinVice President & Treasurer2022–2023Corporate treasury leadership; liquidity, capital markets, and risk management
Lockheed MartinVP, Finance & Business Operations, Space2019–2021Finance leadership for Space segment business operations
Lockheed MartinVP & Controller, Missiles and Fire Control2015–2019Segment controllership; financial reporting and controls

External Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsNotes
No external public company directorships disclosed in SEC filings reviewed

Fixed Compensation

ComponentTermsEffective date
Base salary ($)$850,000 April 21, 2025
Target annual incentive (%)125% of base salary under the Management Incentive Compensation Plan April 21, 2025

Performance Compensation

Annual Incentive Plan (enterprise-level design)

MetricWeightingTarget definitionActual/Payout statusNotes
Sales20% of financial component (within 70% total financial weighting) Company-set annual target (not disclosed) 2025 payout not yet disclosed Financial goals aggregate to 70%: Sales, Segment Operating Profit, Free Cash Flow
Segment Operating Profit40% of financial component Company-set annual target (not disclosed) 2025 payout not yet disclosed Non-GAAP definitions in Appendix A
Free Cash Flow40% of financial component Company-set annual target (not disclosed) 2025 payout not yet disclosed Non-GAAP definitions in Appendix A
Strategic & Operational goals30% overall Enterprise key goals (e.g., growth, strategy, responsible business) (not disclosed in detail) 2025 payout not yet disclosed Committee retains discretion; caps at 200% target

Long‑Term Incentives (design and Scott’s current equity)

InstrumentMetricWeightingVestingGranted/heldNotes
PSUs (program design)Relative TSR50% 3‑year performance cycle Program design applies to executives TSR capped at 100% if negative
PSUs (program design)Free Cash Flow25% 3‑year performance cycle Program design applies to executives Non‑GAAP definitions in Appendix A
PSUs (program design)ROIC25% 3‑year performance cycle Program design applies to executives Non‑GAAP definitions in Appendix A
RSUs (Scott)Time‑based3‑year cliff; vests 02/22/2026 (886 sh), 02/22/2027 (990 sh), 02/26/2028 (962 sh) 886; 990; 962 Each RSU equals one LMT share
LTI eligibility (Scott)LTIP award for CFO roleNext grant in 2026 (subject to Committee approval) Compensation aligned to market comparator group

Equity Ownership & Alignment

CategoryAmountFormDetail
Common stock (direct)382.826 sh DirectAs reported on Form 3 (filed 04/25/2025)
Common stock (indirect, 401k)502.6929 sh IndirectLockheed Martin Salaried Savings Plan
RSUs (unvested)2,838 sh total Derivative886 (02/22/2026); 990 (02/22/2027); 962 (02/26/2028)
Phantom stock units (SSP)179.5842 units IndirectSettle in cash at retirement/termination (1:1 to common)
Ownership guidelines4x base salary for CFO PolicyAchieve within five years; hold net shares from vesting until threshold met
Hedging/pledgingProhibited for directors/officers/employees PolicyBan includes swaps, collars, forwards, exchange funds

Employment Terms

TermProvisionNotes
Employment agreementNone (company policy; no individual CIC agreements) Scott’s CFO comp set to market rate; governance best practice
Severance (Executive Severance Plan)Lump sum: 1× base salary + 1× target annual incentive (CEO 2.99×) Plus 1‑year benefits coverage; outplacement/relocation
Change‑in‑control (CIC)Double trigger for LTI acceleration; non‑qualified pension/deferral accelerated on CIC; substitute awards required to avoid acceleration No CIC gross‑ups; no enhanced pension inclusion of LTI
ClawbacksPolicy on Recovery of Incentive‑Based Compensation; supplemental discretionary clawback on variable pay Administered by Compensation Committee
Non‑compete / non‑solicitRequired via severance plan/LTI agreements (post‑employment covenants) Must execute release and covenants to receive severance
PerquisitesExecutive physicals, relocation (as applicable), personal use of corporate aircraft, home/personal security Security program overseen by CBS Committee given threat environment
Ownership/holdingMust hold net RSU/PSU shares until guideline met; unvested PSUs don’t count to threshold CFO guideline 4× salary
Anti‑hedging/pledgingStrict prohibition Alignment safeguard

Investment Implications

  • Pay‑for‑performance alignment is strong: annual incentives tied to Sales/Segment Operating Profit/Free Cash Flow, and LTI linked to Relative TSR, FCF, and ROIC, creating direct sensitivity to cash generation and capital efficiency that matter for defense primes’ valuation and FCF yield .
  • Near‑term vesting calendar shows RSU cliffs in Feb 2026/2027/2028, which can create episodic selling windows; however, holding requirements until the 4× salary ownership threshold and a ban on hedging/pledging mitigate forced‑sale pressure and support alignment .
  • Retention risk appears contained by the severance framework, clawbacks, and forthcoming 2026 LTI grant sized for the CFO role; absence of employment agreements and no CIC gross‑ups reflects shareholder‑friendly governance without weakening incentive efficacy .
  • Company fundamentals underpin incentive attainment: 2024 sales growth (+5%), $176B record backlog, and $5.3B FCF support cash‑ and TSR‑linked payouts; say‑on‑pay support (93% in 2024) indicates investors view the pay model as appropriately structured .