Sign in

Evan Scott

Chief Financial Officer at LOCKHEED MARTINLOCKHEED MARTIN
Executive

About Evan Scott

Evan T. Scott is Lockheed Martin’s Chief Financial Officer, appointed effective April 17, 2025; he is 48 and a 26‑year company veteran with deep finance leadership experience across business segments and corporate treasury . Lockheed Martin’s incentive programs emphasize pay-for-performance with metrics including Relative TSR, Free Cash Flow, ROIC, Segment Operating Profit, Sales, and strategic goals . Company performance context: 2024 sales were $71.0B (+5% YoY), segment operating profit $6.1B, free cash flow $5.3B, and backlog $176.0B, underpinning compensation outcomes and value creation .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic impact
Lockheed MartinCFO, Missiles and Fire Control (MFC)2024–2025Led segment finance and operations as elected officer
Lockheed MartinVice President & Treasurer2022–2023Corporate treasury leadership; liquidity, capital markets, and risk management
Lockheed MartinVP, Finance & Business Operations, Space2019–2021Finance leadership for Space segment business operations
Lockheed MartinVP & Controller, Missiles and Fire Control2015–2019Segment controllership; financial reporting and controls

External Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsNotes
No external public company directorships disclosed in SEC filings reviewed

Fixed Compensation

ComponentTermsEffective date
Base salary ($)$850,000 April 21, 2025
Target annual incentive (%)125% of base salary under the Management Incentive Compensation Plan April 21, 2025

Performance Compensation

Annual Incentive Plan (enterprise-level design)

MetricWeightingTarget definitionActual/Payout statusNotes
Sales20% of financial component (within 70% total financial weighting) Company-set annual target (not disclosed) 2025 payout not yet disclosed Financial goals aggregate to 70%: Sales, Segment Operating Profit, Free Cash Flow
Segment Operating Profit40% of financial component Company-set annual target (not disclosed) 2025 payout not yet disclosed Non-GAAP definitions in Appendix A
Free Cash Flow40% of financial component Company-set annual target (not disclosed) 2025 payout not yet disclosed Non-GAAP definitions in Appendix A
Strategic & Operational goals30% overall Enterprise key goals (e.g., growth, strategy, responsible business) (not disclosed in detail) 2025 payout not yet disclosed Committee retains discretion; caps at 200% target

Long‑Term Incentives (design and Scott’s current equity)

InstrumentMetricWeightingVestingGranted/heldNotes
PSUs (program design)Relative TSR50% 3‑year performance cycle Program design applies to executives TSR capped at 100% if negative
PSUs (program design)Free Cash Flow25% 3‑year performance cycle Program design applies to executives Non‑GAAP definitions in Appendix A
PSUs (program design)ROIC25% 3‑year performance cycle Program design applies to executives Non‑GAAP definitions in Appendix A
RSUs (Scott)Time‑based3‑year cliff; vests 02/22/2026 (886 sh), 02/22/2027 (990 sh), 02/26/2028 (962 sh) 886; 990; 962 Each RSU equals one LMT share
LTI eligibility (Scott)LTIP award for CFO roleNext grant in 2026 (subject to Committee approval) Compensation aligned to market comparator group

Equity Ownership & Alignment

CategoryAmountFormDetail
Common stock (direct)382.826 sh DirectAs reported on Form 3 (filed 04/25/2025)
Common stock (indirect, 401k)502.6929 sh IndirectLockheed Martin Salaried Savings Plan
RSUs (unvested)2,838 sh total Derivative886 (02/22/2026); 990 (02/22/2027); 962 (02/26/2028)
Phantom stock units (SSP)179.5842 units IndirectSettle in cash at retirement/termination (1:1 to common)
Ownership guidelines4x base salary for CFO PolicyAchieve within five years; hold net shares from vesting until threshold met
Hedging/pledgingProhibited for directors/officers/employees PolicyBan includes swaps, collars, forwards, exchange funds

Employment Terms

TermProvisionNotes
Employment agreementNone (company policy; no individual CIC agreements) Scott’s CFO comp set to market rate; governance best practice
Severance (Executive Severance Plan)Lump sum: 1× base salary + 1× target annual incentive (CEO 2.99×) Plus 1‑year benefits coverage; outplacement/relocation
Change‑in‑control (CIC)Double trigger for LTI acceleration; non‑qualified pension/deferral accelerated on CIC; substitute awards required to avoid acceleration No CIC gross‑ups; no enhanced pension inclusion of LTI
ClawbacksPolicy on Recovery of Incentive‑Based Compensation; supplemental discretionary clawback on variable pay Administered by Compensation Committee
Non‑compete / non‑solicitRequired via severance plan/LTI agreements (post‑employment covenants) Must execute release and covenants to receive severance
PerquisitesExecutive physicals, relocation (as applicable), personal use of corporate aircraft, home/personal security Security program overseen by CBS Committee given threat environment
Ownership/holdingMust hold net RSU/PSU shares until guideline met; unvested PSUs don’t count to threshold CFO guideline 4× salary
Anti‑hedging/pledgingStrict prohibition Alignment safeguard

Investment Implications

  • Pay‑for‑performance alignment is strong: annual incentives tied to Sales/Segment Operating Profit/Free Cash Flow, and LTI linked to Relative TSR, FCF, and ROIC, creating direct sensitivity to cash generation and capital efficiency that matter for defense primes’ valuation and FCF yield .
  • Near‑term vesting calendar shows RSU cliffs in Feb 2026/2027/2028, which can create episodic selling windows; however, holding requirements until the 4× salary ownership threshold and a ban on hedging/pledging mitigate forced‑sale pressure and support alignment .
  • Retention risk appears contained by the severance framework, clawbacks, and forthcoming 2026 LTI grant sized for the CFO role; absence of employment agreements and no CIC gross‑ups reflects shareholder‑friendly governance without weakening incentive efficacy .
  • Company fundamentals underpin incentive attainment: 2024 sales growth (+5%), $176B record backlog, and $5.3B FCF support cash‑ and TSR‑linked payouts; say‑on‑pay support (93% in 2024) indicates investors view the pay model as appropriately structured .