Q1 2024 Summary
Published Feb 18, 2025, 5:24 PM UTC- Strong Customer Interest and Demand: PureCycle is experiencing high customer interest, with many customers eager to test and adopt their recycled polypropylene products. The company has expanded supply into polypropylene compounding—a significant portion of the market—and sees this as an outlet for sales over the course of Q2 and Q3. Customers are excited to start testing materials they haven't had access to before.
- Operational Improvements Increasing Production Capacity: Recent upgrades during the outage have increased the CP2 removal capacity from 3,000-5,000 pounds per day to an estimated 10,000-20,000 pounds per day, which will directly translate to improved feed rates and higher production volumes. These improvements could eliminate previous plant limitations earlier than expected.
- Applying Lessons Learned for Future Growth: The company is leveraging lessons learned from the Ironton facility to improve future plants like Augusta. By integrating operational improvements and working closely with partners like KBR, PureCycle expects to enhance efficiency and potentially reduce costs, positioning the company for significant growth once Ironton operates reliably and at scale.
- Liquidity concerns: PureCycle is burning around $8 million per month in cash expenses , and even with the recent additional liquidity of $30 million, they have only "several months" of runway , raising concerns about their ability to sustain operations without additional financing.
- Operational uncertainties at the Ironton plant: The company's Ironton plant has not yet achieved reliable operations, and they need to demonstrate consistent production over a couple of months before securing further financing. This uncertainty may delay expansion plans, including the Augusta plant, as all partners are "waiting and watching for Ironton" to operate reliably at scale.
- Challenges with customer qualification and product quality: PureCycle is still in the early stages of customer qualification, with varying stages of approval processes. They have faced issues with product quality and cross-contamination during production, affecting their ability to deliver prime material consistently , potentially delaying revenue generation.
-
Revenue Generation and Costs
Q: Will Q2 generate revenue? What are facility costs?
A: The company is excited to ramp up production in Q2 and aims to generate revenue, though customer qualification processes may affect timing. Facility cash expenses are around $8.5 million per month, with expectations that costs will come down as operations become more efficient. -
Financing and Liquidity
Q: Is new debt sufficient? Ability to resell bonds or warrants?
A: The additional $30 million in liquidity provides several months of runway at current burn rates. They expect opportunities to sell additional bonds if Ironton operates consistently for a couple of months. Warrants issued expire in December 2030 with a strike price of $11.50. -
Operational Challenges and Solutions
Q: Need for future plant outages to improve process?
A: The company does not anticipate needing additional outages in 2024, having resolved many reliability issues during the recent outage. They will monitor plant performance and remain open to making improvements as needed. -
Customer Uptake and Off-Take Agreements
Q: Status of customer qualifications and off-takers?
A: They are at the beginning stages with many customers, expanding supply into compounding markets. Despite some cross-contaminated product, customers are willing to trial it, as it's still superior to mechanical recycled material. -
Impact on Augusta Plans
Q: How do Ironton learnings affect Augusta's timeline?
A: Learnings from Ironton are being integrated into Augusta's design, partnering with KBR to improve operability. They are excited about growth potential once Ironton operates reliably at scale. -
Feedstock Strategy
Q: Consider flexing feedstock procurement to reduce CP2?
A: There's ample feedstock supply, and they are exploring options to minimize CP2 content. They may purchase higher-priced feedstocks with less CP2 but are also pursuing affordable solutions like tolling partners to remove CP2 from low-priced feed. -
CP2 Removal Capacity and Impact
Q: Improvements in CP2 removal—effects on production?
A: Enhancements increased CP2 removal capacity to 10,000 to 20,000 pounds per day, directly boosting feed rates. If feedstock contains 10% CP2, this allows feeding up to 200,000 pounds per day. -
Cross-Contamination Issues
Q: Details on cross-contamination experienced?
A: Cross-contamination occurred due to equipment issues and learning curves but involved a small volume. They don't expect this to be a concern going forward. -
Production of Fiber and Film Applications
Q: Feasibility of producing fiber and film products?
A: Removal of CP1 and CP2 is crucial for fiber and film applications due to sensitivity to impurities. They are excited about these large markets and believe their product can meet quality standards. -
Communication with Investors
Q: Plans for consistent communication with the market?
A: Going forward, they plan to provide more periodic updates over the course of Q2.