Sign in

Amy Rawlings

Chief Accounting Officer at RobloxRoblox
Executive

About Amy Rawlings

Amy Rawlings is Chief Accounting Officer (CAO) at Roblox (RBLX), serving since July 2022. She is 40 years old as of April 1, 2025, holds a BA in Business Economics (Accounting emphasis) from the University of California, Santa Barbara, and is a Certified Public Accountant in California. Prior roles include CAO at Zynga and leadership in controllership, SEC reporting, and revenue accounting; earlier she worked at Ernst & Young (2006–2010) . Company performance metrics incorporated into executive incentives emphasize Bookings and Covenant Adjusted EBITDA in 2024 PSU design (0–200% payout over a two‑year period), aligning pay with operational outcomes .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic impact
Zynga Inc.Chief Accounting OfficerAug 2021 – Jul 2022Led U.S. and international accounting operations; SEC reporting and revenue accounting
Zynga Inc.Accounting leadership (Controllership, SEC Reporting, Revenue Accounting)~2009–2021 (12 years)IPO readiness, SOX implementation, accounting standards adoption, financial statement preparation, global revenue recognition
Ernst & YoungAssurance/Accounting2006 – 2010Foundation in audit/accounting practices

External Roles

No external public company directorships or committee roles disclosed for Rawlings in RBLX’s proxy materials .

Fixed Compensation

ComponentDetailSource
Base salary$500,000 annual wage (paid semi‑monthly)
Initial equity grant (RSUs)$3,000,000 grant value; share count determined by 20‑day average closing price; vesting per Board‑approved schedule under 2020 Plan
Equity refresh eligibilityEligible to receive quarterly equity refresh starting 5th quarter from hire (Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct grant cycle; terms at LDCC discretion)
BenefitsHealth plan; 401(k) with match: 100% of first 3% + 50% of next 2% of salary
Employment statusAt‑will; arbitration agreement required; confidentiality and invention assignment

Performance Compensation

Incentive typeMetricTarget/WeightingPayout mechanicsVesting
Company PSU program (2024)Cumulative Bookings; Covenant Adjusted EBITDANot disclosed for Rawlings0–200% of target based on two‑year performance (FY2024–FY2025); certification post‑period67% vests at certification; 33% vests quarterly over 1 year starting May 2026 (exec program design)
RSUs (post-direct listing practice)Service-basedNot disclosed for RawlingsTime-basedGrants in/after July 2022 generally vest over 3 years (company practice)

Notes:

  • No Rawlings‑specific annual bonus target %, actual bonus paid, PSU targets/actuals, or option awards are disclosed in filings. Her initial compensation is predominantly fixed cash plus RSUs, with refresh eligibility . Company programs prohibit hedging/pledging, use double‑trigger CIC arrangements, and maintain stock ownership requirements for executive officers .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

ItemDetailSource
Beneficial ownershipNot specifically disclosed for Rawlings in 2025 proxy tables
Stock ownership guidelinesRobust guidelines apply to all executive officers; no hedging or pledging
Clawback policyCompensation Recovery Policy filed as Exhibit 97.1 (Feb 21, 2024)
Insider trading plans (Rule 10b5‑1)Adopted Aug 28, 2023 for sale up to 40,928 shares; expires Sep 30, 2024 . Terminated May 28, 2024; adopted May 29, 2024 for sale up to 49,138 shares; expires Jun 2, 2025 . Terminated Feb 27, 2025; adopted Feb 27, 2025 for sale up to 25,020 shares; expires Mar 2, 2026 . Terminated Jun 3, 2025 .
Pledging/HedgingProhibited for directors and employees

Insider selling pressure commentary:

  • Multiple pre‑planned 10b5‑1 trading programs tied to RSU vesting cadence suggest periodic supply as shares vest; plans were subsequently terminated (May 2024, Feb 2025, Jun 2025), indicating active management of liquidity windows .

Employment Terms

TermDetailSource
Offer/acceptance datesOffer letter dated Jul 15, 2022; acceptance signed Jul 18, 2022
Role/tenureCAO since July 2022
At‑will & arbitrationEmployment at‑will; binding arbitration; company pays all but first $125 of arbitration fees
Confidentiality/IPConfidential information and invention assignment obligations
Insider trading policyInsider Trading Policy referenced in annual reports
Clawback policyCompensation Recovery Policy (Exhibit 97.1)
Non‑compete/Non‑solicitNot specifically disclosed in Rawlings’ offer letter beyond restrictions on conflicting employment/activities

Compensation Structure Analysis

  • Emphasis on equity vs. cash: Initial RSU grant of $3,000,000 alongside a $500,000 salary indicates high equity leverage for alignment; ongoing refresh eligibility reinforces equity‑heavy mix .
  • Program safeguards: No hedging/pledging, double‑trigger CIC arrangements, robust ownership requirements, and clawback policy support shareholder‑friendly governance .
  • Visibility gaps: No disclosure of Rawlings’ bonus targets, actual payouts, or personal PSU grants/targets limits granular pay‑for‑performance assessment (company‑level PSU design is disclosed) .

Say‑on‑Pay & Shareholder Feedback

  • 2024 Say‑on‑Pay approval: 98% favorable vote; LDCC continues to consider shareholder views in compensation decisions .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment: Large initial RSU grant and refresh structure, coupled with ownership requirements and clawbacks, align Rawlings with long‑term value creation and governance best practices .
  • Selling pressure: Successive 10b5‑1 plans oriented around RSU vesting imply episodic stock supply; terminations in 2024–2025 suggest dynamic management of sales timing, potentially moderating pressure depending on future plan activity .
  • Retention/transition risk: Company uses double‑trigger CIC arrangements broadly for executives (specific terms disclosed for certain officers), which typically reduce retention risk around transactions; Rawlings’ offer letter is at‑will without disclosed severance specifics, leaving individual separation economics unquantified .
  • Data limitations: Absence of Rawlings‑specific ownership totals, option holdings, bonus metrics, and PSU targets/actuals constrains precise pay‑for‑performance calibration; monitoring future proxies and Form 4s is warranted .