Revenues (USD, thousands)

Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) (USD, thousands)

Selling, general and administrative expenses (USD, thousands)

Depreciation and amortization expense (USD, thousands)

Income from operations (USD, thousands)

Interest and other income, net (USD, thousands)

Foreign exchange (loss)/gain (USD, thousands)

Income before provision for income taxes (USD, thousands)

Provision for income taxes (USD, thousands)

Net income (USD, thousands)

Net income per share - Basic (USD)

Net income per share - Diluted (USD)

64e271b0b906d6a3e4389b89988cda9bee837248a3a7790254c285ce4c53eba2

The documents do not provide a definitive reason for the sharp drop in short-term investments in Q3 2024. However, they note that EPAM’s investing activities during this period involved significant expenditures on acquisitions of businesses, capital expenditures on computer hardware, software, office equipment, office buildings, and new businesses, which could indicate that funds were redirected from short-term investments to finance these other investing needs.  **[0001352010-24-000041_exhibit99_q3x2024.htm:6]** **[0001352010-24-000044_epam-20240930.htm:48]** 

Why did Short-term investments drop so sharply in Q3 2024?

EPAM’s lower Cash and cash equivalents in Q2 2024 resulted primarily from **substantial share repurchases**—about **$214 million** spent to repurchase roughly **1.16 million shares**—which significantly reduced their cash reserves. This was compounded by **net cash used in financing activities** (totaling **$338.2 million** over the first six months) and **net cash used in investing activities** (including expenditures for capital investments and acquisitions), as well as a **negative effect from exchange rate changes** amounting to **$26.4 million**. Together, these factors led to an overall drop of approximately **$251.5 million** in cash and cash equivalents.  **[EPAM_3397426_5]** **[0001352010-24-000027_epam-20240630.htm:47]** 

Why was Cash and cash equivalents lower in Q2 2024?

The marked increase in Total assets in Q3 2024 was primarily driven by several factors: **a significant increase in goodwill** (rising from **$562,459 thousand** to **$621,903 thousand**, largely due to the acquisition of NEORIS), **an increase in other noncurrent assets** (up by **$38,618 thousand**), **a rise in trade receivables and contract assets** (up by **$38,045 thousand**), and **an increase in prepaid and other current assets** (up by **$15,714 thousand**). These increases were partially offset by a decrease in short-term investments, but the overall effect was a substantial growth in total assets.  **[0001352010-24-000041_exhibit99_q3x2024.htm:6]** **[0001352010-24-000041_exhibit99_q3x2024.htm:1]** 

What drove the marked increase in Total assets in Q3 2024?

The decline in **Total liabilities** in **Q2 2024** was primarily driven by a **significant reduction** of **accrued compensation and benefits expenses** by **$45,077 thousand**. This decrease was complemented by additional reductions in **Other Noncurrent Liabilities** (down by **$6,819 thousand**) and **Operating Lease Liabilities (Noncurrent)** (down by **$5,607 thousand**).  **[0001352010-24-000024_exhibit99_q2x2024.htm:5]** **[0001352010-24-000027_epam-20240630.htm:1]** 

What factors contributed to the decline in Total liabilities in Q2 2024?

c2571ad6c189d04622226efa51f758990ca58a37382433d6693e49570f7a394f

The documents indicate that despite the high impairment charges in Q3 2024, **no specific reasons** are provided for the increase. Typically, such charges can be associated with **asset write-downs**, **goodwill impairments**, or other **one-time adjustments**, but the documents do not offer an explicit explanation for the Q3 2024 figures.   

Why were impairment charges so high in Q3 2024?

The documents do not provide specific reasons for the surge in proceeds from short-term investments in Q3 2024. They only note that the balance sheet shows short-term investments decreased from **$60,739 thousand** as of December 31, 2023, to **$22,316 thousand** as of September 30, 2024.  **[0001352010-24-000041_exhibit99_q3x2024.htm:6]** 

What drove the surge in proceeds from short-term investments in Q3 2024?

In Q3 2024, the net cash used in investing activities turned positive primarily because **proceeds from matured investments increased significantly** (from **$10.9 million** to **$41.5 million**), which helped to offset the larger cash outflows from **acquisitions of businesses** (rising from **$14.0 million** to **$57.1 million**), along with a small decline in **capital expenditures** (from **$18.4 million** to **$16.4 million**), resulting in a net positive effect overall.  **[0001352010-24-000044_epam-20240930.htm:48]** 

Why did net cash used in investing activities turn positive in Q3 2024?

The low operating cash flow in Q2 2024 was primarily influenced by several factors. One key factor was a **larger increase in days sales outstanding (DSO)**, which negatively impacted the cash flow. Additionally, **cash used for humanitarian efforts for Ukraine** and the **geographic repositioning of EPAM’s workforce** further contributed to the lower operating cash flow. Although lower payments for variable compensation partially offset these declines, the negative effects from increased DSO and the significant outflows for humanitarian and repositioning activities played a prominent role in the subdued operating cash flow performance.  **[0001352010-24-000027_epam-20240630.htm:47]** 

What factors contributed to the low operating cash flow in Q2 2024?

The large negative net change in cash in Q2 2024 was primarily driven by **substantial increases in cash used in both financing and investing activities**. Specifically, EPAM saw a significant **increase in net cash used in financing activities** due to extensive share repurchases (approximately **1.16 million shares for $214 million**), coupled with a rise in cash used for investing activities—mainly attributable to **$56.7 million used for acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired**. These outflows, combined with a **lower incremental contribution from operating activities** and a **negative impact from exchange rate changes** (a decline of **$(26,447) thousand** versus a positive impact in the previous period), collectively led to the large negative net change in cash for the quarter.  **[0001352010-24-000024_exhibit99_q2x2024.htm:0]** **[EPAM_3397426_5]** **[0001352010-24-000027_epam-20240630.htm:47]** **[0001352010-24-000027_epam-20240630.htm:4]** 

What led to the large negative net change in cash in Q2 2024?

7c6e1a5074b60cfc60725d59718e6d7bcab7c994ba1428404ccee05e95e84d34

1bc7aa86021ef137dd5a73672696936e6497b61d96c05f5c9d4656f500f67595

e6f365d95a4a0ec1b82b5b98b432c41df2639e8ba562bcd56d79d2ecddc53efd

d853c1f795e2b2510de7280235652eb2c9f539e98bb664347db0bc7087ac9d65

68ae6d68c5c2c5781b85c9f0f70d93aa1d1b00bc281fa3590bd9bcd7140c03c9

Adjustments for Non-Cash Items [USD, Thousands]

Stock-Based Compensation [USD, Thousands]

Changes in Working Capital [USD, Thousands]

Capital Expenditures (CapEx) [USD, Thousands]

Proceeds from Debt [USD, Thousands]

Repayments of Debt [USD, Thousands]

Share Repurchases [USD, Thousands]

Dividend Payments [USD, Thousands]

Net Change in Cash [USD, Thousands]

cfa79d1c7fb55ea2a3d40082fc6bdcb219aa4623684702fd7af6754b90ab6fb5

Average number of production professionals (percentage)

ff3b2c65de3de2b0719bca8d1064f6cca92d323757ddb14ae1cb2a2bb5823cda

e3fac036622e1244cf37a6ad62aa906c70b90f0303bd724f38410df8be105720

9831447414590a2a507f9982b69985f8fdd12981f8fdde987b709a07997ce0b2

EPAM Systems (EPAM)

Financials